It's like having a para for every student in the room.

Coach every writer in your classroom, at once.

Step-by-step AI feedback for grades 2 to 8 in ELA, science, and social studies. Students submit a draft, get a coach response in seconds, and revise.

Try free, no card See it in action
ELA Science Social Studies ELL · 12 langs
MR
Maya R. · Grade 5 Argumentative · Video games & violence
Step 2 · Paragraph 1: Introduction
Submitted 55 words · 321 characters
I think video games should be allowed and encouraged, let alone banned because some people think they cause violence. The reason I think video games don't cause violence is because countries like Japan have very high usage and very low violence levels.
Reading your writing…
How it works

Simple for teachers.
Powerful for students.

①

Teacher assigns

Pick from 120+ assignment types across ELA, science, social studies. One minute, done.

→
②

Student writes, and gets coached

Step-by-step AI feedback on every draft. ELL scaffolding built in.

→
③

Teacher sees results

Who finished, who's stuck, who needs intervention, all automatically. Print a conference report in one click.

The method

On every submit, it quotes the student back to themselves.

Most AI tools rewrite a student's words. We don't. Every response cites the phrase the student actually wrote, maps it to a grade-level rubric, names what's working, and shows one before-and-after revision they can choose to take. The thinking, and the credit, stays theirs.

  • Quotes the student's own words back, no vague vibes
  • Maps every score to the grade-level rubric, with a reason
  • Shows one revision: Currently → Try, never the whole rewrite
  • Word banks + sentence frames for ELL scaffolding
Maya submitted · Paragraph 1: Introduction
“I think video games should be allowed and encouraged, let alone banned because some people think they cause violence.”
Why this score · 4/5 Proficient
Takes a position by stating, “I think video games should be allowed and encouraged.” This aligns with the ‘Proficient’ level as the position is identifiable and arguable.
Next level
‘let alone banned’ should be ‘not banned’ to make your sentence clearer.
91%
Drafts revised before submit
6.4 hrs
Saved per teacher / week
3×
More feedback per student
Every digital assignment has a printable companion.
One-pager PDFs with the same prompt, scaffolds, and rubric. Use them for sub days, no-tech blocks, or take-home work.
Browse printables →
Authenticity check

Indicators of externally sourced text, surfaced quietly.

Every submission gets checked for the fingerprints of copy-paste and outside drafting. We flag the indicators in plain language and note that scores on flagged assignments may not fully reflect independent writing ability. We never accuse a specific tool or student. The judgment is yours.

  • Flags em-dashes, curly quotes, and other characters typical of paste, not direct keyboard entry
  • Compares essay voice against the same student's short-answer baseline from the same sitting
  • Notes that scores on flagged assignments may not fully reflect independent writing ability
  • Never names a specific AI tool or makes accusations. Indicators only.
External Source Characters (+2 more)
Some submissions showed indicators of externally sourced text. Review the evidence and decide what action to take.
How to read this
Rayce M. · Grade 6 · Ancient Civilizations · Submitted May 7
EXTERNAL SOURCE CHARACTERS
Essay contains 2 em-dashes, 2 right curly quotes. Characters that require auto-formatting or copy-paste, not direct keyboard entry on a school device.
VOICE MISMATCH
Essay voice significantly more polished than Part 1 short responses from the same sitting. Sample A uses simple, conversational phrasing; the submitted essay shifts to formal, academic register mid-paragraph.
PASTE EVENT DETECTED
248 characters pasted at 14:02 during the drafting phase. Compare to typing rhythm before and after the paste window.
Score still reflects rubric evaluation. Scores on flagged assignments may not fully reflect independent writing ability. Open submission →
The class view

One screen tells you who's stuck, who's flying.

Open your class, see today: a class average, a one-line risk flag, and a one-line celebration. No drilling, no spreadsheets. The same surface you'd hand a sub or pull up in a parent meeting.

  • Roster split by mastery band, updated on every submit
  • Auto-flagged students averaging below 60%
  • Quick actions: Live Lesson, Parent Updates, Encourage
  • Per-assignment completion + average grade at a glance
Ms. Garcia's 5th Grade ELA
26 students · 2 assignments
Live Lesson Parent Updates Encourage Invite Students
Class Avg: 81.9% | 15 new completions since last visit
11 advanced 8 proficient 3 developing 1 needs support 3 no data
!
1 student averaging below 60%: Esmael.
View Students
★
6 students are performing well with 3+ completed assignments and a strong average.
Assignments Students Grades Standards Insights
Assignment Assigned Completed In Prog. Not Start. Avg Grade Status
Typing Practice
Keyboarding Skills
2/24/2026
22 / 26
1 3 91.3% Active
Standards-aligned, automatically

Skills first.
Frameworks underneath.

Mastery is grouped by what students are actually doing (making arguments, evaluating sources, drafting narratives), not by a wall of standard codes. Each skill cluster spans CCSS, NGSS, and C3, so a student who's strong on argument writing in ELA shows up strong on argument analysis in social studies. The codes are still there when you click in.

CCSS · ELA NGSS C3 · Social Studies
  • 4-level mastery: Advanced, Proficient, Developing, Beginning
  • Click any cluster to drill into the underlying standards
  • Cross-subject transfer: see one skill in three frameworks at once
Standards mastery · 5th Grade ELA
26 students · 24 assignments completed
Skills Frameworks
All ELA Science Social Studies
▼ Argument & Claims
CCSS C3
Proficient 4 standards
Code Standard Mastery Assessed
W.5.1.A Introduce a topic clearly, state an opinion, create an organizational structure. Proficient 22/24
W.5.1.B Provide logically ordered reasons supported by facts and details. Proficient 20/24
W.5.1.C Link opinion and reasons using words, phrases, and clauses. Developing 18/24
D2.His.16.6-8 Organize evidence into a coherent argument about the past. No data 0/24
▶ Explanation & Informative
CCSS NGSS
Developing 4 standards
▶ Textual Evidence & Source Analysis
CCSS C3
Proficient 4 standards
▶ Evaluating Arguments
CCSS C3
Developing 4 standards
▶ Narrative & Creative Writing
CCSS
Advanced 4 standards
▶ Language & Conventions
CCSS
Proficient 4 standards
▶ Writing Process
CCSS
Beginning 4 standards
7 skill clusters · 11 framework alignments Open class report →
Every subject

Coaching that knows what subject it's reading.

ELA

Argument, narrative, informational, CER.

120+ assignment types tuned per grade band. Knows the difference between a topic sentence and a thesis.

“Add a counterclaim before your conclusion. What might someone who disagreed say?”
Science

CER, lab reports, hypotheses.

Coaches the science of writing science: variables, evidence, mechanism. Aligned to NGSS Practice 7.

“Your hypothesis names the variable but not the predicted direction. Try: ‘If…then…because…’”
Social Studies

DBQ, sourcing, contextualization.

C3 to the bone. Pushes students from summarizing sources to corroborating across them.

“You used Source A. What does Source C say about the same event?”
ELL

Word banks, sentence frames, glossaries.

Differentiated for every proficiency level, without singling anyone out. 12 home languages supported.

“Try: ‘One reason ___ is ___. For example, ___.’ Pick a word from the bank below.”

Ready to get back
your evenings?

Sign in with Google, set up your first class in 90 seconds, and let your students start writing better drafts tonight.

Get started, free
What teachers say
“First tool my students use without me having to remind them. Drafts come in twice as good.”
LB Lena B. · 6th grade ELA · Brooklyn, NY